At a glance

Numbered findings
19

Control and compliance issues in the report

Material weaknesses
2

The highest financial-reporting control category

Repeat findings
9

Issues reported in at least one earlier audit

Opinion scope
See report opinion

Opinion scope varies by report year and accounting basis

The opinion is not a pass/fail grade

Most regulatory statements received clean opinions—with an important exception.

Unmodified in substance under the regulatory basis; adverse GAAP-basis opinion.

Read the three opinion scopes
  • New Jersey regulatory basis: Unmodified in substance.
  • U.S. GAAP: Adverse because the mandated regulatory basis differs from GAAP.
  • Fixed assets: None
Every numbered finding

What needs to change

“Material weakness” is an audit-control classification, not an allegation of fraud. Open a finding for the condition, why it matters, the auditor's recommendation, repeat history, and the City's separately labeled response.

12-01 · noncompliance material to financial statements · Repeat since FY2010

Aged unfunded capital costs

Unfinanced costs for capital projects more than five years old totaled $35,872,028: $25,970,341 for general and school projects and $9,901,687 for water projects.

Why it matters

The City was not in compliance with State capital-project funding requirements and faced cash-flow concerns.

Auditor recommendation

Fund all unfunded deferred charges more than five years old from which unfinanced costs have been paid.

Official report p. 284 · Includes a compliance issue

12-02 · material weakness

Untimely bank reconciliations

The 2012 payroll clearing account was not reconciled until July 2013, and the 2012 vendor clearing account remained unreconciled at the report date.

Why it matters

Errors, bank errors, or possible defalcations might not be identified and corrected promptly, potentially affecting the financial statements.

Auditor recommendation

Ensure all bank accounts are reconciled in a timely manner.

Official report p. 285

12-03 · material weakness · Repeat since CY2011

Grant and capital-account reconciliations

CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, and ESG balances were not reconciled to IDIS; UEZ balances were not reconciled to JCEDC records; and Capital Fund Improvement Authorizations did not agree with the subsidiary ledger.

Why it matters

Grant balances could not be validated, and unreconciled improvement authorizations could be overexpended.

Auditor recommendation

Adopt closing procedures requiring personnel to reconcile CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, UEZ, Capital Improvement Authorizations, and other applicable accounts to underlying and oversight records.

City response · unaudited

The City will retain year-end IDIS reports, review and close temporary CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA accounts, and work with JCEDC to reconcile UEZ accounts.

Responsible area: Responsible officials of the City

Official report pp. 285–288 · Includes a compliance issue

1 · control deficiency · Repeat since TY2010

PILOT true-up bills and agreement terms

PILOT testing found five outdated true-up billings, one improperly charged administration fee, and one missing financial agreement; the City began corrective follow-up after year end.

Why it matters

Abatement properties were not consistently billed under their financial agreements.

Auditor recommendation

Continue corrective action for abatement properties not adhering to agreements, including timely default notices and true-up billings.

Official report p. 307

2 · control deficiency

Delayed rent-roll abatement billing

For abatements based on rent rolls, the City did not bill charges until property-owner payments were received.

Why it matters

Abatement billing was delayed instead of being based on timely rent-roll analysis.

Auditor recommendation

Obtain quarterly rent-roll analyses and bill accordingly, using prior-year rent rolls provisionally when a current analysis is late.

Official report p. 307

3 · control deficiency

Omitted added assessments

Two of ten tested Certificates of Occupancy had not been included in the 2012 added and omitted assessments.

Why it matters

The related assessments were deferred to the following year.

Auditor recommendation

Review all Certificates of Occupancy and include them in added assessments in the year issued.

Official report p. 307

4 · noncompliance

Severance spending without appropriation

The City spent $7,619,611 for contractual severance liabilities without a legal appropriation, violating N.J.S.A. 40A:4-57.

Why it matters

The unappropriated expenditure must be raised in the succeeding year's budget.

Auditor recommendation

Raise expenditures made without appropriation in the succeeding year's budget.

Official report p. 307 · Includes a compliance issue

5 · noncompliance · Repeat since TY2010

Insufficient court and tax-collector bonds

Court and Tax Collector surety bond coverage did not meet the minimum requirements of N.J.A.C. 5:30-8.4(a) and 5:30-8.3(a).

Why it matters

The report does not state a separate effect.

Auditor recommendation

Review projected court revenue and the tax levy annually and obtain the required minimum bond coverage.

Official report p. 308 · Includes a compliance issue

6 · control deficiency · Repeat since CY2011

Unavailable payroll authorization records

Testing of employee deductions and W-4 authorizations could not be completed because supporting records were archived, stored, or otherwise unavailable.

Why it matters

Auditors could not verify that sampled employee deductions and W-4 forms were properly authorized.

Auditor recommendation

Retain W-4 forms and employee-deduction support permanently in personnel files.

Official report p. 308

7 · control deficiency

Grant receipts posted to wrong lines

Some State and Federal Grants Fund receipts were posted to incorrect grant lines, requiring a reallocation line in the grant-receivable detail.

Why it matters

Grant receivable detail required adjustment to reflect the proper grants and years.

Auditor recommendation

Post receipts to the correct grants and grant years.

Official report p. 308

8 · control deficiency · Repeat since CY2011

Dormant grant receivables and reserves

The State and Federal Grants Fund carried $55,964,723 of receivables and $46,034,566 of appropriation reserves, including balances more than ten years old, and the capital fund had $2,059,900 of dormant grant receivables.

Why it matters

Aged balances might be uncollectible, charged to the wrong grant year, expendable, or refundable to grantors.

Auditor recommendation

Investigate dormant grant receivables and reserves for collectability, correct grant-year classification, expenditure eligibility, or return to grantors.

Official report pp. 308–309

9 · control deficiency · Repeat since CY2011

Untagged fixed assets

Vehicles and mobile equipment lacked inventory tags, and five of 25 other sampled 2012 fixed-asset additions also had no tag.

Why it matters

The City could not trace all physical assets to its inventory.

Auditor recommendation

Make every physical asset traceable to the inventory by requiring tags or recording other identifiers such as vehicle identification numbers.

Official report p. 309

10 · control deficiency · Repeat since CY2011

Missing or transferred fixed assets

Seven of 25 sampled fixed assets could not be located because they had been disposed of or transferred without consistent compliance with City procedures.

Why it matters

The fixed-asset inventory did not reliably reflect asset locations, transfers, and disposals.

Auditor recommendation

Reinforce fixed-asset disposal and transfer policies with department personnel and ensure the procedures are followed.

Official report p. 309

11 · control deficiency

Dormant Capital Fund reserves

Eight Capital Fund reserve accounts totaling $603,752 had no activity since years ranging from 2004 through 2010.

Why it matters

Dormant balances remained without a current review of their legal basis or disposition.

Auditor recommendation

Review dormant Capital Fund reserves, retain support for legally required balances, and charge or cancel other reserves when allowed.

Official report pp. 309–310

12 · noncompliance

Trust reserves without Dedication by Rider

Numerous Trust Fund reserves appeared to lack an approved Dedication by Rider.

Why it matters

The legal authorization supporting the reserves was not evident.

Auditor recommendation

Review unsupported Trust Fund reserves for proper follow-up or disposition.

Official report p. 310 · Includes a compliance issue

13 · noncompliance

Reserve cancellations without resolution

The City cancelled $501,963 of dormant Trust Fund reserves and $229,672 of General Capital Fund reserves without a supporting resolution.

Why it matters

Reserve cancellations lacked governing-body authorization in the audit record.

Auditor recommendation

Support every reserve cancellation with a resolution of the governing body.

Official report p. 310 · Includes a compliance issue

14 · control deficiency

Operating activity in MLK capital reserve

The General Capital Fund's MLK Reserve recorded operating revenues and charge-backs for security services and utility bills rather than long-term capital activity.

Why it matters

Operating activity was recorded in a fund intended for long-term capital costs and related debt.

Auditor recommendation

Include MLK Reserve operating activity in the annual Current Fund budget.

Official report p. 310

15 · control deficiency

Debt reimbursements outside the budget

The City recorded reimbursements for debt payments as reserves or miscellaneous revenue not anticipated.

Why it matters

Debt reimbursements were not budgeted to offset the related debt-service appropriation.

Auditor recommendation

Anticipate debt reimbursements as Current Fund budget revenue to offset related debt-service appropriations.

Official report p. 310

16 · control deficiency · Repeat since CY2011

Recreation cash-receipt controls

Prior-year Recreation cash-control deficiencies remained: applications and records were not reliably available, some fees lacked governing-body approval, and receipts were not deposited timely with Treasury.

Why it matters

The Recreation Department could not reliably account for cash collected and on hand.

Auditor recommendation

Institute stronger controls over cash collected and on hand and follow the controls implemented by the fiscal officer.

Official report p. 311 · Includes a compliance issue

Historical audits

Choose a report year

CY is a calendar year, FY is the older June-ending fiscal year, and TY2010 is the transition period. Comparative CY2022 also represents CY2021.

Official PDF archive

Supporting source evidence, not the primary reading experience. Independent audits only; budgets and Annual Financial Statements are separate.

ReportYears coveredSource
CY2025 2025, 2024 Open official PDF
CY2024 2024, 2023 Open official PDF
CY2023 2023, 2022 Open official PDF
CY2022 2022, 2021
No separate CY2021 report was published; this comparative audit covers both 2022 and 2021.
Open official PDF
CY2020 2020, 2019 Open official PDF
CY2019 2019, 2018 Open official PDF
CY2018 2018, 2017 Open official PDF
CY2017 2017, 2016 Open official PDF
CY2016 2016, 2015 Open official PDF
CY2015 2015, 2014 Open official PDF
CY2014 2014, 2013 Open official PDF
CY2013 2013, 2012 Open official PDF
CY2012 2012, 2011 Open official PDF
CY2011 2011, 2010
This report covers CY2011 and the 2010 transition year.
Open official PDF
TY2010 2010
Transition-year report for the period ending December 31, 2010; it also compares the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.
Open official PDF
FY2010 2010 Open official PDF
FY2009 2009 Open official PDF
FY2008 2008 Open official PDF
FY2007 2007 Open official PDF
FY2006 2006 Open official PDF

Project Solomon is independent of the City of Jersey City. Structured audit facts are manually source-checked; City management responses are unaudited.